[fdo-internals] CMakeLists

[Greg Boone]

Helio,

As a start on moving this RFC forward, why don’t you submit the "CMakeLists.txt" files that you have ready, and we can go from there.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:12 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] [fdo-internals] build script confusion RFC62???

Cmake is still an open idea and the RFC is still pending. Now that 3.4 is out, we can start discussing it again if you wish.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Helio Chissini de Castro
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:49 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] [fdo-internals] build script confusion RFC62???

On Sexta-feira 17 de abril 2009 09:41:18 Greg Boone wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have to follow-up on Jason's statement that any significant change in the
> FDO build/install needs an RFC so that we can asses impact and plan
> accordingly. I also re-iterate Trevor's statement that there is a clear
> separation between build and install directory structures. It seems that
> MapGuide is using a variant of the current FDO install structure. I think
> we could come to some agreement on the install structure, but changes to
> the build structure would require much more consideration.
>
> Greg
>

If mg go down this road in near future, can i mumble about Cmake something 
again ? :-)

-- 
Helio Chissini de Castro
KDE Developer
Brasil/South America Primary Contact
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals