[FOSS-GPS] Re: New Project with RTKlib & need help.

julio menezes yjmenezes at yahoo.com.br
Mon Jan 2 15:23:17 EST 2012


--- Em seg, 2/1/12, Mauro Ugarte Avilés <mauro.ugarte at cefop.udec.cl> escreveu:

> De: Mauro Ugarte Avilés <mauro.ugarte at cefop.udec.cl>
> Assunto: Re: [FOSS-GPS] Re: New Project with RTKlib & need help.
> Para: "Open Source GPS-related discussion and support" <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>
> Data: Segunda-feira, 2 de Janeiro de 2012, 17:55
> 
> >
> > Taking your words, I'm not good at GPS relative terms
> and algorithms too.
> >
> Me neither :-)
> > I think that the moving base must have an fixed and
> known lenght .
> If you review the "setting2" tab on RTKNAVI 2.4.x options,
> you will see 
> that the "Baseline Length Constraint (m)" is an option, not
> a 
> requirement, even when  "Moving Base" is selected as
> positioning mode on 
> "setting1" tab. Considering this, I thought that both
> options where 
> valid (constrained and unconstrained length). One may think
> that is just 
> a programming bug if it remains as an option and not as a
> requirement, 
> but if you select "moving base" you will see that on the
> "Positions" tab 
> automatically the option to input the base antenna position
> dissapeared, 
> from which I conclude that nothing is left to chance on
> this swiss knife 
> that RTKlib is :-).

Hi Mauro,

tks for your explanation, I hope to return to study the RTKLIB very soon. 
As you say, "nothing is left to chance on this swiss knife" !
A moving base without lenght constrains let me realy impressed with RTKLIB.
My tks for all developers. 

[]s
julio menezes



More information about the FOSS-GPS mailing list