[FOSS-GPS] Re: New Project with RTKlib & need help.
julio menezes
yjmenezes at yahoo.com.br
Mon Jan 2 15:23:17 EST 2012
--- Em seg, 2/1/12, Mauro Ugarte Avilés <mauro.ugarte at cefop.udec.cl> escreveu:
> De: Mauro Ugarte Avilés <mauro.ugarte at cefop.udec.cl>
> Assunto: Re: [FOSS-GPS] Re: New Project with RTKlib & need help.
> Para: "Open Source GPS-related discussion and support" <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>
> Data: Segunda-feira, 2 de Janeiro de 2012, 17:55
>
> >
> > Taking your words, I'm not good at GPS relative terms
> and algorithms too.
> >
> Me neither :-)
> > I think that the moving base must have an fixed and
> known lenght .
> If you review the "setting2" tab on RTKNAVI 2.4.x options,
> you will see
> that the "Baseline Length Constraint (m)" is an option, not
> a
> requirement, even when "Moving Base" is selected as
> positioning mode on
> "setting1" tab. Considering this, I thought that both
> options where
> valid (constrained and unconstrained length). One may think
> that is just
> a programming bug if it remains as an option and not as a
> requirement,
> but if you select "moving base" you will see that on the
> "Positions" tab
> automatically the option to input the base antenna position
> dissapeared,
> from which I conclude that nothing is left to chance on
> this swiss knife
> that RTKlib is :-).
Hi Mauro,
tks for your explanation, I hope to return to study the RTKLIB very soon.
As you say, "nothing is left to chance on this swiss knife" !
A moving base without lenght constrains let me realy impressed with RTKLIB.
My tks for all developers.
[]s
julio menezes
More information about the FOSS-GPS
mailing list