[FOSS-GPS] RTKPLOT - Difference in output

[julio menezes]

Hi Max,

Please, send me your  rtknavi_rtk.conf  ( configuration file )

check your settings, the solution header shows L1+L2, must be L1 only:

% pos mode  : moving-base 
% freqs     : L1+L2

take a look 2.4.2 manual page 39.
ʺBaseline Length Constraintʺ enabled
pre‐determined baseline length

I will look your files this weekend.

[]s
julio menezes






Em Quinta-feira, 27 de Fevereiro de 2014 6:23, mazahirp <mazahir.poonawalla at gmail.com> escreveu:
 
Hi Julio,

Thanks. Yes I am attaching the necessary files.
So my setup is such that I used one as a base and one as rover, both kept approx 14 - 15 meters apart. Both are as input to RTKNAVI via serial and I am logging data, baseline and lat/long/altitude in three different files respectively. 

I have attached 2 zip folders containing logs of 2 different config options. Both are as "Moving Base", and hence no base position is required. One folder is containing data for "continuous" ambiguity resolution setting and the other for "fix and hold". Both capture only L1. Rest of the settings are default.

Using the baseline file, I plotted the E/N/U values in excel. Using the base and rover log files, I converted to RINEX using RTKCONV and then did a RTKPOST followed by plotting using RTKPLOT. There is a difference between baseline position plot in excel and RTKPLOT. 

I am sharing all my files. I hope all this will help you to figure out what is going on, what is right or wrong and what could be rectified and how should it be taken forward. 

Do let me know in case you need anything else.

Thank you once again.

Cheers,
Max


 MovingBase_Fix&Hold.zip

 MovingBase_Continuous.zip





On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:19 PM, julio menezes [via Open Source GPS-related discussion and support] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Max,
>
>Could you share your config,  your raw logged data,  rtkpost solutions and base station position ?
>Please, if possible, describe your field test.
>Although I do not use Excel or Windows, I will try to help.
>
>regards
>julio menezes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Em Quarta-feira, 26 de Fevereiro de 2014 2:40, mazahirp <[hidden email]> escreveu:
> 
>Hi All,
>
>Any help on this one? How could I study this better?
>
>Thanks once again.
>
>Cheers,
>Max
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context: http://open-source-gps-related-discussion-and-support.1099874.n2.nabble.com/RTKPLOT-Difference-in-output-tp7572823p7572824.html
>
>Sent from the Open Source GPS-related discussion and support mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>_______________________________________________
>This message is sent to you from [hidden email] mailing list.
>
>Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription
>For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________ 
>This message is sent to you from [hidden email] mailing list. 
>
>Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription 
>For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS 
>
>
>________________________________
> 
>If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://open-source-gps-related-discussion-and-support.1099874.n2.nabble.com/RTKPLOT-Difference-in-output-tp7572823p7572825.html 
>To unsubscribe from RTKPLOT - Difference in output, click here.
>NAML 

________________________________
 View this message in context: Re: RTKPLOT - Difference in output

Sent from the Open Source GPS-related discussion and support mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140227/1a67c47a/attachment-0001.html>