[Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Bruce Bannerman]

Tyler, Lorenzo and all,

I'm sensing some reluctance to have a CCIP type of event at FOSS4G.

Raj and I discussed this issue this morning and feel that we don't 
want to force this event on the FOSS4G community. We want to maintain 
good relations.

We will begin making contingency plans and look at alternate events 
that we could run a CCIP type of event at.

GSDI-12 is one possible alternative. It is also perhaps a better fit 
for the ideals of the event.


Bruce



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: foss4g2010-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:foss4g2010-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
> Bruce Bannerman
> Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2009 10:58 AM
> To: tmitchell at osgeo.org
> Cc: 'foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org'; raj at rajsingh.org
> Subject: RE: [Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> 
> G'day Tyler,
> 
> I will put something together as soon as we're able.
> 
> I have a call with Raj on Tuesday where we will discuss the 
> best way to answer this. We will be preempting CCIP community 
> discussion. Let me know if you need more than this email in 
> the short term.
> 
> Suffice to say that we aim to have a much more structured 
> project approach to the 2010 event, with more time for 
> planning and project delivery. I would ideally like to have a 
> one day stream at FOSS4G-2010 dedicated to CCIP-2010 where 
> participants could expose their work in more detail. We have 
> yet to have this conversation with both communities though. 
> We are also aiming for significantly higher sponsorship dollars.
> 
> CCIP would bring in more revenue to FOSS4G in participants 
> alone, exposing (some) to FOSS4G perhaps for the first time. 
> It will also bring in revenue from Conference facilities etc. 
> There will also be a great additional stream of marketing for 
> FOSS4G-2010. 
> 
> Strategically, FOSS4G will be seen as great community 
> partners of OGC and in doing something positive in the 
> Climate arena to try and make systems interoperable  and to 
> help ensure that the real 'numbers' are available for 
> scrutiny via open standards.
> 
> I anticipate that the lessons learned will come out of the 
> SWOT analysis.
> 
> 
> One thing that we would like to pursue with greater vigour 
> this year is to how to get greater Open Source spatial 
> participation in the event.
> 
> One idea that I'm pursuing is the idea of CCIP Participant 
> partnerships between science communities and spatial 
> communities / vendors. We should be able to achieve this if 
> we target the scenarios right. This may give OS Communities 
> the opportunity to get involved via a 'science' sponsor, 
> perhaps an organisation like my own.
> 
> Anyway, these are preliminary thoughts that need to be worked 
> through with the relevant communities.
> 
> 
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Tyler Mitchell [tmitchell.osgeo at shaw.ca]
> Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2009 4:21 AM
> To: Bruce Bannerman
> Cc: 'foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org'
> Subject: Re: [Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> 
> Hi Bruce, glad to here you've recovered enough ;)
> 
> For me the CCIP process was a bit opaque - could you give 
> Lorenzo and the rest of us an overview on the main benefit of 
> running the process?  e.g. how did it add value to the FOSS4G 
> event - both subjectively and financially.  And how much work 
> did it require from someone on the LOC?
> 
> Also, do you have any sort of "lessons learned" compiled anywhere?
> 
> Thanks!  G'day,
> Tyler
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bruce Bannerman <B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au>
> Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:03 pm
> Subject: [Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> To: "'foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org'" <foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org>
> 
> > Lorenzo,
> >
> > >
> > > hi all,
> > > we've been revisiting the contents of the prospectus.
> > > We've set up prices and other details.
> > >
> > > there's still a couple of things, mostly about refining
> > contents and using
> > > proper English, that should be done.
> > >
> > > we invite you all to contribute, in the wiki or in this list.
> > >
> > > the revision time will be until next monday then we'll pass
> > the content to
> > > the designer for the final layout.
> > >
> > > here's the content of the prospectus:
> > >
> > 
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2010_Sponsorship_and_Exhibitor_Prosp
> > ectus>
> > > Lorenzo
> >
> > I've had a quick look at the Prospectus.
> >
> > For CCIP-2009, we found that trying to get CCIP sponsorship for 
> > participants via the Conference Organiser and also OGC 
> didn't work and 
> > was just plain confusing for potential participants.
> >
> > The FOSS4G CCIP sponsorship package offered very little to 
> potential 
> > sponsors.
> >
> >
> > In the end, we assigned the responsibility for obtaining 
> sponsorship 
> > dollars to the OGC.
> >
> >
> > The money that the OGC raised helped run the CCIP project.
> >
> > A substantial portion of the major CCIP Sponsor's funding 
> came back to 
> > FOSS4G for booth, conference etc fees.
> >
> > I can give you these figures off line.
> >
> >
> > In short, I'd leave the CCIP sponsorship arrangements with 
> the OGC and 
> > negotiate suitable costs depending on CCIP-2010 requirements.
> >
> >
> > I'd say that you will be getting people attending 
> FOSS4G-2010 just to 
> > see the results of CCIP-2010. We will need to ensure that 
> there is a 
> > definite programe of interest presented. So there will be 
> additional 
> > return there as well.
> >
> >
> > Bruce
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>