[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 103 - OGR_SCHEMA open option
Javier Jimenez Shaw
j1 at jimenezshaw.com
Fri Nov 29 13:31:49 PST 2024
+1 Javier
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, 18:44 Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev, <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
> *Lähettäjä:* gdal-dev <gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> *Puolesta *Even
> Rouault via gdal-dev
> *Lähetetty:* perjantai 29. marraskuuta 2024 19.41
> *Vastaanottaja:* ElPaso <elpaso at itopen.it>; gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> *Aihe:* Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 103 - OGR_SCHEMA open option
>
>
>
> Are PSC members shy or too busy with turkeys ;-) ? In any case,
>
> +1 Even
>
> Le 26/11/2024 à 17:18, ElPaso via gdal-dev a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Motion:
>
> Adopt RFC 103: OGR_SCHEMA open option[1]
>
> I have updated the RFC [1] with:
>
> - updated JSON schema with field rename support
>
> - removed GDAL_DMD_OGR_SCHEMA_OPEN_OPTION_FLAGS (after talking to Even
> about using DMD_OPEN_OPTION_LIST instead)
>
>
> There is also a complete candidate implementation for the GML driver at
> [2]
>
>
> Kind regards.
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11071 and formatted:
> https://gdal--11071.org.readthedocs.build/en/11071/development/rfc/rfc103_schema_open_option.html
>
> [2] https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11334
>
> --
>
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20241129/51cdf3ad/attachment.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list