[gdal-dev] GDAL 3.10.0 rc2 available (was Re: GDAL 3.10.0 release candidate is available)

[Even Rouault]

>
> should it? In https://github.com/holans/ST-COS/issues/2 there is a 
> chunk from a backtrace in gdb from CPL_area to 
> OGRGeometryCollection::get_GeodesicLength, which CPL_area didn't call 
> itself.

This is fishy. As you use the C++ API, I assume you've rebuilt the sf 
package against the GDAL 3.10.0 headers ... ? Because currently it 
smells like not, and some virtual method mixup. Or the stack-trace isn't 
reliable (which might happen sometimes because of optimizations)


-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.