[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 105: Add and use safe path manipulation functions

[Howard Butler]

+1 Howard

Thanks for all the effort.

> On Jan 15, 2025, at 9:13 AM, Even Rouault via gdal-dev <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The candidate implementation is now ready (I'm afraid nobody will find the energy to review the ~ 4000 different edits throughout the code base... ) and all CI targets are green. *All* use of the deprecated C versions has been removed from our C++ code (besides the place where they are defined, and autotest code), and the few uses of them in C code is OK. There's no risk of re-introducing them since their definition is now hidden from GDAL C++ code.
> 
> So,
> 
> Motion: RFC 105 text: Add and use safe path manipulation functions: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11640
> 
> Starting with my +1,
> 
> Even
> 
> -- 
> http://www.spatialys.com <http://www.spatialys.com/>
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20250115/16b8ab7e/attachment.htm>