[geomoose-psc] RFC-9: Adopt new linting and code formatting rules

[Eli Adam]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 8:35 AM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:

> RFC-4 is why I thought we may need an RFC for this. Since it would
> supersede what is in the previous RFC. Maybe RFC-4’s codification if the
> standard was misguided but we’re stuck with it now.
>

After rereading RFC-4, I don't think that we codified any standards in the
RFC and were wise enough to make reference to standards (which have already
changed once before see /developer/standards vs /docs/style_guide).
Updating the style guide and a simple PSC vote by email or IRC at the next
meeting make sense to me but I'd like to hear from others too.



> We could also revise RFC-9 to accept whatever we put
> into the style guide and the style guide is changed by simple vote.
>

If we did paint ourselves into the corner with RFC-4, I think this is a
better path out.  I see it as already falling into the realm of routine
project functions.

Best regards, Eli


>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 09:24 Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
>> A consistent style is important.  I'm generally in favor of this but
>> would be open to discussion before voting.  I have some hesitancy of
>> putting this in an RFC if a simple PSC vote would suffice.
>>
>> We would need to look at other conflicting information that might be in
>> https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose-website/blob/ac3cbbbb54457f08a75f558167e81c94ad8484a0/source/rfc/rfc-4.rst
>> or https://docs.geomoose.org/3.x/style_guide.html
>>
>> Why an RFC instead of a PSC vote on updating the style guide?  I expect
>> our coding style and guidelines to change again in ten to fifteen years.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:55 PM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey folks!
>>>
>>> An itch that I've been wanting to scratch for a while is some code clean
>>> up practices. The Javascript world has started to really center around some
>>> opinionated tooling that has really been standard practice now. I wrote the
>>> following RFC:
>>> -
>>> https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose-website/blob/ac3cbbbb54457f08a75f558167e81c94ad8484a0/source/rfc/rfc-9.rst
>>>
>>> And put together what the changes will look like:
>>>  - https://github.com/theduckylittle/gm3/pull/2
>>>
>>> I would like to officially put RFC-9 open for comments and a vote.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20220630/61e39daf/attachment-0001.htm>