[geomoose-psc] Pull Request Review Request!

[Jim Klassen]

I was (finally) able to get through these.   I've added a couple of comments, and it looks like others have some unanswered comments too.  Generally, I like where these PRs are going, and I'd like to get these merged before they stack up so deep that we've effectively forked our own project, but I am looking for some consensus from the PSC before I do so.

On 8/2/26 11:54 AM, Dan Little via geomoose-psc wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> I've got a few pull requests that have had some good work put into them, I think are good enhancements, and were also sponsored work. I'd love to get them reviewed, merged, and released.
>
> This is a "stack" of PRs that would add back the feature report:
>
> - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/999 : Restores the "print to scale" functionality. I've updated this with the curated list from the PSC suggestions.
> - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1000 : This is marked as merging into 999 because it made testing of the tick lines a bit easier. This cleans up the PDF scale line to match the updated scale line on the map. I feel this one is an easy one to review.
> - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1013 : Last but not least, the return of the feature report! This adds a sample feature report and layout to the parcels layer along with all the appropriate docs.
>
> After some feedback from folks (DM/emails) I did take the time to "promote" the basemap toggle to a mainline component. I think the "experiemental" status made it scary and left us not testing it (which is why we needed a react 18 fix for it in the first place):
> - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1015
>
> Last but not least I've drafted a first AI/LLM policy here:
> - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1016
>
> Thanks y'all!
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc