[geomoose-psc] Pull Request Review Request!

[TC Haddad]

We have a PSC meeting Friday, so maybe Jim’s email can serve as a nudge to
everyone to take a look at these and either provide feedback ahead of or in
time for Friday’s meeting…

best,
Tanya

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 12:04 PM Jim Klassen via geomoose-psc <
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> I was (finally) able to get through these.   I've added a couple of
> comments, and it looks like others have some unanswered comments too.
> Generally, I like where these PRs are going, and I'd like to get these
> merged before they stack up so deep that we've effectively forked our own
> project, but I am looking for some consensus from the PSC before I do so.
>
> On 8/2/26 11:54 AM, Dan Little via geomoose-psc wrote:
> > Hi Folks!
> >
> > I've got a few pull requests that have had some good work put into them,
> I think are good enhancements, and were also sponsored work. I'd love to
> get them reviewed, merged, and released.
> >
> > This is a "stack" of PRs that would add back the feature report:
> >
> > - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/999 : Restores the "print to
> scale" functionality. I've updated this with the curated list from the PSC
> suggestions.
> > - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1000 : This is marked as merging
> into 999 because it made testing of the tick lines a bit easier. This
> cleans up the PDF scale line to match the updated scale line on the map. I
> feel this one is an easy one to review.
> > - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1013 : Last but not least, the
> return of the feature report! This adds a sample feature report and layout
> to the parcels layer along with all the appropriate docs.
> >
> > After some feedback from folks (DM/emails) I did take the time to
> "promote" the basemap toggle to a mainline component. I think the
> "experiemental" status made it scary and left us not testing it (which is
> why we needed a react 18 fix for it in the first place):
> > - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1015
> >
> > Last but not least I've drafted a first AI/LLM policy here:
> > - https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/pull/1016
> >
> > Thanks y'all!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geomoose-psc mailing list
> > geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20260817/3d988f78/attachment-0001.htm>