[Geomoose-users] display the results and zoom.
FRANZ OKYERE
franzzoa at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 28 16:54:59 EDT 2009
Hi all, I quit on using processquerytemplate and processtemplate methods. Its just not helpful. I spent too much time on it. I'm rather using mysql to display the results- its perfect. However the layer does not persist when i click on one of the result to zoom to it. Anyone with similar experience or suggestion? Thanks very much. Franz. GIS Specilist. SIT.
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:26:02 -0600
> From: bfraser at geoanalytic.com
> To: bfischer at houstoneng.com
> CC: geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] map-source; only 2 valid types?
>
> Brian,
>
> I'd be interested in seeing Google Maps access implemented, and I'd be
> willing to give up printing the Google Maps layer if it meant I could view it on
> the screen.
>
> Looking through GM v2's main.js and OpenLayer's google.html example, it
> appears that adding a layer type of "Google" looks simple. But I'm concerned
> about the projection. Would it mean that my site would have to use Spherical
> Mercator as the view projection? Would Dan's recent enhancement of raster
> projection in OpenLayers be useful so I could set a view projection of UTM? Or
> would performance be a problem?
>
> Best Regards,
> Brent (the other Brent) Fraser
>
>
> Brian Fischer wrote:
> > Brent,
> >
> > These two layer types that are on my wish list to integrate into
> > GeoMOOSE, as well as Tilecache layer types. Maybe we could pool some
> > money together to have Dan implement them?? As Dan and I have talked
> > about this in the past the tricky part is whether you need to be able to
> > print these layer types to .pdf. That requirement would be a much
> > larger effort than just making them viewable.
> >
> >
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > Met Council just released a new basemap AGS Rest API service for the
> > twin cities. See snippet from email below. Jessica did mention she
> > tested this and got it to work with OpenLayers. It’s pretty nice and
> > sure would be cool to show it can be used in GeoMOOSE!
> >
> >
> >
> > *Metropolitan Council ArcGIS Base Map Services*
> >
> >
> >
> > The Metropolitan Council is making available two cached base map
> > services through ArcGIS Server./ /The Metropolitan Council base map
> > contains common data layers symbolized and shown appropriately for 10
> > scale levels; including roadways, water features, political boundaries,
> > Parks, trails, and land marks. The base map will be updated as
> > necessary to maintain current data - at least quarterly to allow for
> > MetroGIS municipality and road updates.
> >
> >
> >
> > These services are available for use in within ArcMap, in web
> > applications through use of Rest Services, and as a layer in Google Earth.
> >
> >
> >
> > * *BaseMap*: In Web Mercator Projection suitable for use in mashups
> > with Google Maps.
> > http://gis.metc.state.mn.us/ArcGIS/rest/services/BaseLayer/BaseMap/MapServer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * *UTMBaseMap*: Same Features and Symbology as BaseMap above, but
> > projected for UTM, better for use with other MetroGIS data.
> > http://gis.metc.state.mn.us/ArcGIS/rest/services/BaseLayer/UTMBaseMap/MapServer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Brian Fischer,* CFM GIS Project Manager
> > *Houston Engineering, Inc.*
> > Phone: W: 763.493.4522 / M: 763.229.2734
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Dan Little [mailto:danlittle at yahoo.com]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:56 AM
> > *To:* Brent Lund (ADM); geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > *Subject:* Re: [Geomoose-users] map-source; only 2 valid types?
> >
> >
> >
> > Currently unimplemented. The reason is that the actual requests are
> > managed by GeoMOOSE and require full integration in with the catalog to
> > work correctly. This simply hasn't happened with those two types yet.
> > ArcGIS93Rest may take a while because I'm not sure anyone has a test
> > server for me to utilize.
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Brent Lund (ADM) <Brent.Lund at state.mn.us>
> > *To:* "geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net"
> > <geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:51:56 AM
> > *Subject:* [Geomoose-users] map-source; only 2 valid types?
> >
> > Is the documentation http://www.geomoose.org/moose/docs/mapbook.html
> > correct in referring to only 2 valid types (mapserver, wms). Are
> > other OpenLayers types valid (but undocumented)? In particular I
> > am interested in utilizing OpenLayers types Google and ArcGIS93Rest.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brent
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
> > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
> > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geomoose-users mailing list
> > Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users
_________________________________________________________________
Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20090928/d1eb7710/attachment.html
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list