[Geomoose-users] Performance File Geodatabase vs Shapefiles

[Ed Boesenberg]

I added a file geodatabase to a new GM 2.6 application and the file
geodatabase is slower at loading the features than compared to using
shapefiles.  My FGDB has two feature datasets (manholes and pipes) with over
2,000 features each.  Is anyone using a file geodatabase to store their data
and do you notice any performance decrease when compared to shapefiles?

 

Ed

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20121012/7eae6660/attachment.html>