[Geomoose-users] GeoMoose 3 - Speed

[TC Haddad]

For the contours data, and any data that is not dynamic, I’d strongly
recommend turning on MS4W’s  MapCache, so the cache can be in 3857 and your
original data can stay as is. You can set it up so that you do not have to
precache, and instead cache on the fly. Works very well.

For the survey data, which I assume changes more frequently, I would try
setting up a PostGIS view in 3857, so that the reprojection is not done by
Mapserver or GeoMoose. Not sure how much it will help but it should improve
the situation to some degree.



On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:00 PM Christopher Hughes <chughes at co.lincoln.or.us>
wrote:

> It looks like it may be the reprojection. If I set all the parameters and
> extents to our local projection in the mapfile and in the
> geomoose_globals.map it loads at the same speeds as my geomoose 2 mapfile
> using shp2image, but it still loads slowly in
> geomoose as it's reprojected to 3857. If I instead switch everything to
> 3857 it loads rapidly (although in a different location as my data isn't in
> 3857). I tested it out by reprojecting my contours dataset to 3857 and it
> loads much faster than the dataset
> still in our local projection.
>
> Any ideas how to work around this other than reprojecting all my data or
> changing all the files that are hard-coded as 3857? See issue:
> https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/issues/192
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:34 AM TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Another thing to try is to do the reproduction in a PostGIS view, so that
>> GeoMoose is not trying to do it in the browser...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:40 AM Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <
>> bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Try sending the same request you are sending in the GeoMoose 2 version
>>> to the GeoMoose 3 version (without reprojection) and compare the speeds.
>>> If everything else is working but just slower, it might be a result of the
>>> reprojection overhead.
>>>
>>> bobb
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 10:18 AM, Christopher Hughes <
>>> chughes at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> *Think Before You Click: *This email originated *outside *our
>>> organization.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm using an older version of mapserver on this server for geomoose 2
>>> (which is the one rendering faster).
>>> I am reprojecting to our local coordinate system which I didn't have to
>>> do for geomoose 2. Perhaps I have my extent coordinates wrong.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 10:54 AM Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> Chris Hughes
>
> GIS Analyst
> Lincoln County Surveyor Department
> 880 NE 7th
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/880+NE+7th?entry=gmail&source=g> St.
> l Newport, OR 97365
> Tel: (541) 574 1283
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20200203/d3a9c9e7/attachment.html>