[GeoNode-users] Support for Python 3 or SNI (Server Name Indication) when using https

[Simone Dalmasso]

Hi Daniel,

I can only answer to your last question and is no, at the moment there are
no plan to move to 3 but since you raised this and is an issue we will
discuss it at the next geonode summit. Could you please open a ticket in
the issue tracker copying your email, I'll flag it properly.

Thanks

2016-11-01 17:39 GMT+01:00 Daniel Victoria <daniel.victoria at gmail.com>:

> Hi list,
>
> I think I've hit a httplib2 bug that is causing trouble in my GeoNode
> Install. I have GeoNode (v2.4.1) running on Ubuntu 14.01. The server is
> behind a reverse proxy that has multiple SSL certificates associated with
> only one IP address.
>
> The problem is that when I try to upload some data to GeoNode, I get a
> certificate mismatch. The returned certificate is the one associated with
> the IP address of the reverse proxy and not the certificate my geonode site.
>
> From what I was told, the ability to resolve multiple SSL certificates
> from one address is implemented through SNI (Server Name Indication). And
> from this Github issue [2], it appears that Python 2.7 and its httplib2
> will not receive SNI support.
>
> Another thing that makes me believe it's a python2.7+httplib2 specific
> problem is that If I try to connect to my site using python2 and httplib2
> it fails but, using python3, it works.
>
> So, the questions are:
> Is anyone running GeoNode behind a reverse proxy that implements multiple
> SSL certificates for one address (SNI)?
> Will the next release of geonode use python3?
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-users/2016-June/001933.html
> [2] https://github.com/jcgregorio/httplib2/issues/233
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-users mailing list
> geonode-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-users
>
>


-- 
Simone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-users/attachments/20161103/481412a0/attachment.html>