[geos-devel] Re: geos::geom::triangle

Jo doublebyte at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 20:39:41 EDT 2009


By the way:

geos/algorithm/CGAlgorithms.h
geos/algorithm/HCoordinate.h

(and a bunch of other algorithms) seem to be also excluded from the offical
release...
I am gonna stop bothering you with this, because I now installed Geos from
SVN!

                            cheers,
                                       Jo

2009/7/13 <geos-devel-request at lists.osgeo.org>

> Send geos-devel mailing list submissions to
>        geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        geos-devel-request at lists.osgeo.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        geos-devel-owner at lists.osgeo.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of geos-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: geos::geom::triangle (Mateusz Loskot)
>   2. Adding STRtree and PreparedGeometry support to SWIG
>      (Schuyler Erle)
>   3. Re: [GEOS] #276: "make check" failed at geos_unit on      mingw (GEOS)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:56:24 +0100
> From: Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net>
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] geos::geom::triangle
> To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> Message-ID: <4A5A5C08.30603 at loskot.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Jo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Anybody knows what happened to the geos ::geometry::Triangle class?
> > Its present in the headers of my source code, but not in the installed
> > headers (actually, I think is commented in the geometry header)
> >
> > Im usin geos 3.0.3
>
> This header is intentionally excluded from the installation
> see lines 51-52
>
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/browser/tags/3.0.3/source/headers/geos/geom/Makefile.am
>
> Though, I don't know why, probably incomplete implementation.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:55:51 -0400
> From: Schuyler Erle <schuyler at nocat.net>
> Subject: [geos-devel] Adding STRtree and PreparedGeometry support to
>        SWIG
> To: geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> Message-ID: <1247464551.6323.53.camel at goldman>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Howdy, folks. I've created tickets in GEOS Trac for three patches I
> created to implement STRtree and PreparedGeometry in the SWIG bindings,
> with the gracious financial support of FortiusOne's GeoCommons.
>
> The first patch adds an iterate() method to AbstractSTRTree to permit
> iterating (via the visitor pattern) over all items that have been
> inserted into the tree, regardless of bounds. Currently, there is no
> public method for accessing inserted items in an STRtree without having
> to first build the tree (thus preventing insertion of further items). I
> implemented this method in order to be able to store Ruby objects in the
> the STRtree, thanks to Ruby's mark-and-sweep garbage collector.
>
>  http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/277
>
> The second patch adds the STRtree class to the C API. The ItemVisitor
> class is subclassed to allow calling GEOSSTRtree_query() from C with a
> callback function pointer and a (void *) accumulator.
>
>  http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/278
>
> The third patch adds STRtree and PreparedGeometry support to the SWIG
> bindings. Also included are some niceties for the Ruby bindings, to
> handle the aforementioned GC marking, and to permit Ruby code blocks to
> be wrapped as ItemVisitor callbacks.
>
>  http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/279
>
> It took me quite a bit of time and effort to get my head around the way
> GEOS is designed in order to get these patches implemented, so I'm keen
> to do what's needed to get them into SVN. I welcome any feedback anyone
> has to offer. Thanks very much!
>
> SDE
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:25:50 -0000
> From: "GEOS" <geos-trac at osgeo.org>
> Subject: [geos-devel] Re: [GEOS] #276: "make check" failed at
>        geos_unit on    mingw
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> Message-ID: <054.4fec17ea41a922af59ee10392222ceb2 at osgeo.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> #276: "make check" failed at geos_unit on mingw
>
> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  sanak       |        Owner:  geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>     Type:  defect      |       Status:  new
>  Priority:  major       |    Milestone:  3.2.0
> Component:  Default     |      Version:  svn-trunk
>  Severity:  Unassigned  |   Resolution:
>  Keywords:  mingw       |
>
> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
> Comment (by pramsey):
>
>  I'm not sure how to address this, the flags are inherited from the lower
>  level Makefile. You could compile the whole suite w/o optimization or just
>  not compile w/ 'check'. Do you have a patch?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/276#comment:1>
> GEOS <http://geos.refractions.net/>
> GEOS (Geometry Engine - Open Source) is a C++ port of the Java Topology
> Suite (JTS).
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
> End of geos-devel Digest, Vol 81, Issue 6
> *****************************************
>



-- 
"#define QUESTION ((bb) || !(bb))"  (Shakespeare)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20090719/89f3ddeb/attachment.html


More information about the geos-devel mailing list