[GRASS5] Branching for 5.0.0 ahead

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:20:57PM +0000, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Apr 23, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
>  > Calling it something like
>  > 	releasebranch_24_April_2002_5_0_0
>  > seems to be consistant with what we've used before.
> 
> This is consistent, but is it necessarily useful? Specifically, does
> the presence of the date serve any useful purpose? The presence of the
> date in the tag makes it very hard to predict/remember the name of the
> tag.
> 
> Without the date, it would be quite easy to remember how to checkout
> the branch for a given release branch, for example:
> 
> 	cvs -r releasebranch_5_0_0

We already had this as non-branch tag.
Its was already (ab)used.... :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020423/2cc0d39f/attachment.bin