[GRASS5] [bug #2852] (grass) Library - libgrass_interpfl.5.7.cvs.dylib - is not built

[William K]

Hmm, I'm having no problems with this on the 2004-12-13 CVS snapshot.   
I don't do CVS updates so I can't say for 12-17, maybe something  
changed in the code?

This looks like my patch I do for Mac OS X SHLIB_LD.  Works for me.

Paul - I've been meaning to get some action on my bug for the SHLIB_LD  
thing for Mac OS X (#2544). (I thought I sent something out recently to  
the bug, but I don't see it there)  I've been successfully using these  
changes on all snapshots since I opened the bug.

	    SHLIB_CFLAGS="-fno-common"
	    SHLIB_LD="cc -dynamiclib -Wl,-flat_namespace,-U,_cuserid  
-compatibility_version 5.7 -current_version 5.7 -install_name  
\${LIB_RUNTIME_DIR}/lib\${LIB_NAME}\${SHLIB_SUFFIX}"

The versions are probably not critical, but the key is the install  
name.  The versions should use some sed voodoo to get the grass version  
string into an acceptable form instead of being hardcoded.  I ditched  
my different settings for Mac OS 10.2 and 10.3 - the dynamic lookup  
thing for 10.3 was causing problems in a few modules at runtime.


On Dec 17, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Paul Kelly wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Request Tracker wrote:
>
>> this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2852
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>> Subject: Library - libgrass_interpfl.5.7.cvs.dylib - is not built
>>
>> Platform: Mac OSX
>> grass obtained from: CVS
>> grass binary for platform: Compiled from Sources
>> GRASS Version: 57cvs_041217
>>
>> libgrass_interpfl.5.7.cvs.dylib is not built.
>> Following this lib I have 2 missing bin: r.resamp.rst, v.surf.rst.
>> Last rows in make:
>> .....
>> cc -dynamiclib -Wl,-flat_namespace,-U,_cuserid -compatibility_version  
>> 5.7 -current_version 5.7
>                     
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You must have  
> made some changes to your compile flags as those are commented out in  
> CVS
>
> SHLIB_LD should be simply "cc -dynamiclib -single_module"
> and any errors in individual modules should be corrected by fixing the  
> errors in the source code of that module, not by tweaking the global  
> compile flags.
>

-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos at charter.net>
http://webpages.charter.net/kyngchaos/

"I ache, therefore I am.  Or in my case - I am, therefore I ache."

- Marvin