[GRASS5] Re: [bug #3246] (grass) d.vect.thematic fails when the map is in another mapset

[Michael Barton]

If you want to change your local version, please go right ahead and see how
it looks.

Let's not change the cvs version until we have a consensus (if possible).
For work in my field (archaeology) and from what I know of geography, the
notation 

]min ; max]

would be meaningless--although it might be perfect for your field

Michael
______________________________
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
School of Human Evolution and Social Change
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ  85287-2402
USA

voice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton


> From: Daniel Calvelo Aros <dcalvelo at minag.gob.pe>
> Reply-To: <daniel.calvelo at minag.gob.pe>
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 12:22:08 -0500
> To: Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu>, Maciek Sieczka
> <werchowyna at epf.pl>, Paolo Cavallini via RT <grass-bugs at intevation.de>
> Cc: grass devel <grass5 at grass.itc.it>
> Subject: Re: [GRASS5] Re: [bug #3246] (grass) d.vect.thematic fails when the
> map is in another mapset
> 
> From: Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu>
> Sent: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:12:41 -0700
> [...]
>> 
>> I tend to agree with you that
>> 
>> min - max
>> 
>> looks better than
>> 
>>> min - max
>> 
>> although the second one is more accurate.
>> 
>> What does everyone else think?
> 
> I'd like the math standard :
> 
> [min ; cut1]
> ]cut1 ; cut2]
> ...
> ]cutn ; max]
> 
> Note the *included* min. I'll see if I can put that into your current script,
> Michael.
> 
> Daniel.