[GRASS5] d.vect.thematic on Mac OS X

[Daniel Calvelo Aros]

I'm on MacOSX right now. Quick and dirty, since "." is in the PATH:

1. Unpack Michael's thematic.tgz; 
2. start grass (I use 6); 
3. within grass cd to the thematic/d.vect.thematic directory; 
4. issue a 'cp ../v.univar.sh/v.univar.sh .'
5. presto.

You won't see colors in the graphical legend, though (you need CVS for that).

Daniel

-- Daniel Calvelo Aros

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Thomas Adams" <Thomas.Adams at noaa.gov>
To: Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu>
Cc: grass5 at grass.itc.it
Sent: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:07:20 -0400
Subject: [GRASS5] d.vect.thematic on Mac OS X

> Michael,
> 
> I would like to play with d.vect.thematic. I have installed 
> LorenzoMoretti's GRASS distribution for Mac OS X for both 5.4 & 6.0 
> anduse both. What do I need to do to try it out? Thanks for your help.
> 
> Regards,
> Tom
> 
> Michael Barton wrote:
> If you want to change your local version, please go right ahead and 
> see how it looks.
> 
> Let's not change the cvs version until we have a consensus (if 
> possible). For work in my field (archaeology) and from what I know 
> of geography, the notation
> 
> ]min ; max]
> 
> would be meaningless--although it might be perfect for your field
> 
> Michael
> ______________________________
> Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
> School of Human Evolution and Social Change
> Arizona State University
> Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
> USA
> 
> voice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671
> www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
> 
> From: Daniel Calvelo Aros <dcalvelo at minag.gob.pe>
> Reply-To: <daniel.calvelo at minag.gob.pe>
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 12:22:08 -0500
> To: Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu>, Maciek Sieczka
> <werchowyna at epf.pl>, Paolo Cavallini via RT <grass-
> bugs at intevation.de> Cc: grass devel <grass5 at grass.itc.it> Subject: 
> Re: [GRASS5] Re: [bug #3246] (grass) d.vect.thematic fails when the 
> map is in another mapset
> 
> From: Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu>
> Sent: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:12:41 -0700
> [...]
> I tend to agree with you that
> 
> min - max
> 
> looks better than
> 
> min - max
> although the second one is more accurate.
> 
> What does everyone else think?
> I'd like the math standard :
> 
> [min ; cut1]
> ]cut1 ; cut2]
> ...
> ]cutn ; max]
> 
> Note the *included* min. I'll see if I can put that into your 
> current script, Michael.
> 
> Daniel.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass5 mailing list
> grass5 at grass.itc.it
> http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5
> 
> -- 
> Thomas E Adams
> National Weather Service
> Ohio River Forecast Center
> 1901 South State Route 134
> Wilmington, OH 45177
> 
> EMAIL: thomas.adams at noaa.gov
> 
> VOICE: 937-383-0528
> FAX: 937-383-0033
------- End of Original Message -------