[GRASS-dev] 6.3.0 is out! please prepare binaries...

[Wolf Bergenheim]

IMHO it should be called 6.3.1 since 6.3.0 was already released.

In SVN tags act exactly as branches, so in principle we could simply 
checkout the tag and commit.

--Wolf

On 21.04.2008 19:29, Markus Neteler wrote:
> hi,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  2008/4/21, Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>:
>>> Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0.
>>  >
>>  >  The reason is that changes to the way that SUBDIRS was handled in
>>  >  imagery/Makefile resulted in most of the modules not being built. The
>>  >  specific change in question is r30999.
>>  >
>>  >  Essentially, only the modules listed in $(FFTWBASED) and $(XMONBASED)
>>  >  are actually built (assuming that FFTW and X11 respectively are
>>  >  enabled). The modules which are supposed to be built unconditionally
>>  >  are actually never built.
>>  >
>>  >  I have just committed a fix to the trunk (r31065), but all of the
>>  >  6.3.0 binary packages which people have built will be missing the
>>  >  following modules:
>>  >
>>  >         i.ask
>>  >         i.atcorr
>>  >         i.cluster
>>  >         i.find
>>  >         i.gensig
>>  >         i.gensigset
>>  >         i.group
>>  >         i.his.rgb
>>  >         i.maxlik
>>  >         i.rectify
>>  >         i.rgb.his
>>  >         i.smap
>>  >         i.target
>>  >         i.pca
>>  >         i.cca
>>  >
>>
>>  very bad news after tagging 6.3.0, better to discover now then later,
>>  thanks Glynn! I have backported fixed Makefile to releasebranch_6_3. I
>>  am afraid we need to tag 6.3.0 again(?)
> 
> *Can* we redo 6.3.0? Or go directly for 6.3.1?
> 
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

-- 

<:3 )---- Wolf Bergenheim ----( 8:>