[GRASS-dev] 6.3.0 is out! please prepare binaries...

[Martin Landa]

Hi,

2008/4/21, Wolf Bergenheim <wolf+grass at bergenheim.net>:
> IMHO it should be called 6.3.1 since 6.3.0 was already released.
>
>  In SVN tags act exactly as branches, so in principle we could simply
> checkout the tag and commit.

since we haven't officially announced release 6.3.0, maybe we can tag
again, something like 6_3_0_1?

Martin

>  --Wolf
>
>
>  On 21.04.2008 19:29, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >  2008/4/21, Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>:
> > >
> > > > Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0.
> > > >
> > >  >
> > >  >  The reason is that changes to the way that SUBDIRS was handled in
> > >  >  imagery/Makefile resulted in most of the modules not being built.
> The
> > >  >  specific change in question is r30999.
> > >  >
> > >  >  Essentially, only the modules listed in $(FFTWBASED) and
> $(XMONBASED)
> > >  >  are actually built (assuming that FFTW and X11 respectively are
> > >  >  enabled). The modules which are supposed to be built unconditionally
> > >  >  are actually never built.
> > >  >
> > >  >  I have just committed a fix to the trunk (r31065), but all of the
> > >  >  6.3.0 binary packages which people have built will be missing the
> > >  >  following modules:
> > >  >
> > >  >         i.ask
> > >  >         i.atcorr
> > >  >         i.cluster
> > >  >         i.find
> > >  >         i.gensig
> > >  >         i.gensigset
> > >  >         i.group
> > >  >         i.his.rgb
> > >  >         i.maxlik
> > >  >         i.rectify
> > >  >         i.rgb.his
> > >  >         i.smap
> > >  >         i.target
> > >  >         i.pca
> > >  >         i.cca
> > >  >
> > >
> > >  very bad news after tagging 6.3.0, better to discover now then later,
> > >  thanks Glynn! I have backported fixed Makefile to releasebranch_6_3. I
> > >  am afraid we need to tag 6.3.0 again(?)
> > >
> >
> > *Can* we redo 6.3.0? Or go directly for 6.3.1?
> >
> > Markus
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-dev mailing list
> > grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
> >
>
>  --
>
>  <:3 )---- Wolf Bergenheim ----( 8:>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  grass-dev mailing list
>  grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>


-- 
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *