[GRASS-dev] 6.3.0 is out! please prepare binaries...

[Markus Neteler]

To avoid a mess, we'll do 6.3.0.1 after
- backport of Makefile fix (done)
- backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)

Thanks to Martin for the 6.3.0.1 idea.

Markus

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
>  On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  2008/4/21, Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>:
>  > > Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0.
>  >  >
>  >  >  The reason is that changes to the way that SUBDIRS was handled in
>  >  >  imagery/Makefile resulted in most of the modules not being built. The
>  >  >  specific change in question is r30999.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Essentially, only the modules listed in $(FFTWBASED) and $(XMONBASED)
>  >  >  are actually built (assuming that FFTW and X11 respectively are
>  >  >  enabled). The modules which are supposed to be built unconditionally
>  >  >  are actually never built.
>  >  >
>  >  >  I have just committed a fix to the trunk (r31065), but all of the
>  >  >  6.3.0 binary packages which people have built will be missing the
>  >  >  following modules:
>  >  >
>  >  >         i.ask
>  >  >         i.atcorr
>  >  >         i.cluster
>  >  >         i.find
>  >  >         i.gensig
>  >  >         i.gensigset
>  >  >         i.group
>  >  >         i.his.rgb
>  >  >         i.maxlik
>  >  >         i.rectify
>  >  >         i.rgb.his
>  >  >         i.smap
>  >  >         i.target
>  >  >         i.pca
>  >  >         i.cca
>  >  >
>  >
>  >  very bad news after tagging 6.3.0, better to discover now then later,
>  >  thanks Glynn! I have backported fixed Makefile to releasebranch_6_3. I
>  >  am afraid we need to tag 6.3.0 again(?)
>
>  *Can* we redo 6.3.0? Or go directly for 6.3.1?
>
>  Markus
>



-- 
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://www.osgeo.org/
http://www.grassbook.org/