[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #676: r.watershed: different output map
options do not allow for fully qualified map names
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Tue Jul 7 09:57:39 EDT 2009
#676: r.watershed: different output map options do not allow for fully qualified
map names
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.0
Component: Raster | Version: 6.4.0 RCs
Resolution: | Keywords: r.watershed
Platform: Linux | Cpu: Unspecified
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by glynn):
Replying to [comment:6 mlennert]:
> IIUC, the problem actually comes from the use of G_legal_filename() in
these modules (r.reclass is another of them). So the question is: should
modules check for legality of given file names ?
File names or map names? G_legal_filename() checks that the argument is
valid as a single component of the path, i.e. a valid location name,
mapset name, (unqualified) map name, or element name.
> And if yes, should they use G_legal_filename().
Modules shouldn't normally use this function. It's meant for use by low-
level library functions.
> And if yes, should G_legal_filename() check for fully qualified names ?
No. It's called G_legal_filename() rather than e.g. G_legal_map_name()
because it deals with filenames, not map names.
If modules are passing map names to it, the modules should be fixed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/676#comment:7>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list