[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS-SVN] r44977 - in grass/trunk: gui/wxpython/xml imagery imagery/i.evapo.PT

[Yann Chemin]

Hi Martin,

(Thx, did not read that one yet, so did now)

I would tend to agree with Jarek too.

The use of Module keywords should facilitate the three layers
mentioned, and maybe special keywords like "core", "toolbox",
"experimental" could permit three levels of compilation of GRASS GIS
(Basic, Advanced, Dev).

Yann

On 12 January 2011 22:35, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/1/12 Yann Chemin <yann.chemin at gmail.com>:
>> yeah no problem to move to small caps, initial reason was that it was
>> Family names abbreviation...
>>
>> +1 to avoid them too
>
> please do.
>
> Other issue, probably there should be discussion about new modules -
> if to add them to trunk or leave them in addons. My personal
> experience is that most of users (students at my courses) are confused
> by number or GRASS modules. I really like idea of toolboxes which
> presented Jarek some time ago [1]. Trunk should contain only core
> modules from this perspective.
>
> Martin
>
> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2010-April/050210.html
>
> --
> Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
>



-- 
Yann Chemin
www.csu.edu.au