[GRASS-dev] Submitting rules for images and r.viewshed example

Vaclav Petras wenzeslaus at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 18:11:32 PDT 2016


Hi all,

looking at r69472 I wonder if we want to change submitting rules. The
current guideline is saying 600px width. Consequently both the image and
the max are image takes in the page is 600px. The height is assumed to be
smaller than that (I assume). The image in r69472 is wider in the page
itself and the actual image is lager as well.

I actually like the clickable images as a way of showing full detail but
then the question is what should be size in the page. And another question
is what about the download size of the images (we have be conserving size
till now). And related to that, do we need thumb nails (might be too
complicated but also might be done automatically)?

Best,
Vaclav

https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/69472
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Submitting/Docs#Images

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, <svn_grass at osgeo.org> wrote:

> Modified:
>    grass/trunk/raster/r.viewshed/r.viewshed.html
>    grass/trunk/raster/r.viewshed/r.viewshed.png
> Log:
> r.viewshed manual: improved example screenshot; clickable
> ...
>  </pre></div>
>
>  <div align="center" style="margin: 10px">
> -<img src="r.viewshed.png" border=0><br>
> -<i>Viewshed</i>
> +<a href="r.viewshed.png">
> +<img src="r.viewshed.png" width="900" alt="r.viewshed example"
> border=0><br>
> +</a>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20160914/6abdb40d/attachment.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list