[GRASS-dev] grass wiki: de-emphasize grass6

Veronica Andreo veroandreo at gmail.com
Wed Aug 2 04:16:38 PDT 2017


Hi Paulo :)

2017-07-29 14:01 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>:

> On 29/07/17 12:13, Paulo van Breugel wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I was looking at https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/R_statistics and I
>> noticed that references to GRASS 6 and spgrass6 are still prominent on this
>> page. Perhaps it is time to move all these to a less prominent place on the
>> page, e.g., as note near the end that R can also interface with grass 6
>> through the spgrass6 package?
>>
>
Please, feel free to enhance/re-organize the R_statistics and derived wiki
pages. Two years ago, we did some refactoring of them, but there's still a
lot of space for improvement. I agree with your suggestion of moving
grass6/R interface to a note in the end... GRASS stable version is 7 for
some years already

Also, if you work with R and GRASS and want to contribute new examples,
that's more than welcome! :)


> More in general, there are several places on the wiki where grass 6 still
>> features rather prominently (e.g., https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wi
>> ki/GRASS_Help). The wiki is a community effort so I can make an attempt
>> to improve pages, but before I do so, perhaps it is good to have a general
>> idea / consensus how to deal with information/links to grass 6.
>>
>> In my opinion, the emphasis should be on information related to grass 7,
>> removing reference to grass6 were not relevant, and otherwise move it to
>> e.g., 'legacy' pages (which could like back to the more recent information,
>> similar to the manual pages). What do you think?
>>
>
> +1
>

+1

Vero
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20170802/21f6a4ba/attachment.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list