[GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?

[Vaclav Petras]

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
> >> <massimodisasha at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > ‘’’
> >> >  I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists
> are increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible
> >> > ‘’’
> >> >
> >> > What about migrating our mailing list to mailman3?
> >> > The postorius interface looks modern and when integrated with hyper
> kitty, allows an easy access to the list archives (including search and
> post statistics).
> >> >
> >>
> >> I fully agree with this proposal, but this should be done at OSGeo
> >> Level, Massimo do you want to investigate this solution with SAC?
>
> Did anyone open a ticket for that? I didn't see it yet in case.
>
> > Or I can click on that one checkbox in GitHub settings. :-)
>
> Not sure.
> Please also note that QGIS is actually closing their GitHub
> Discussions for reasons also having mentioned here.
> See
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2021-February/009244.html
>

If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be having
a discussion about GitHub Discussions in the first place.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20210209/62734780/attachment.html>