[GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?

Moritz Lennert mlennert at club.worldonline.be
Tue Feb 9 09:07:04 PST 2021

On 9/02/21 10:00, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
>>> <massimodisasha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ‘’’
>>>>   I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists are increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible
>>>> ‘’’
>>>> What about migrating our mailing list to mailman3?
>>>> The postorius interface looks modern and when integrated with hyper kitty, allows an easy access to the list archives (including search and post statistics).
>>> I fully agree with this proposal, but this should be done at OSGeo
>>> Level, Massimo do you want to investigate this solution with SAC?
> Did anyone open a ticket for that? I didn't see it yet in case.
>> Or I can click on that one checkbox in GitHub settings. :-)
> Not sure.
> Please also note that QGIS is actually closing their GitHub
> Discussions for reasons also having mentioned here.
> See
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2021-February/009244.html

I especially like this argument:


More information about the grass-dev mailing list