[GRASS-dev] Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8

Markus Metz markus.metz.giswork at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 12:27:31 PST 2021

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Nicklas Larsson <n_larsson at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Moritz,
> I'd be honoured!
> I will put it on GRASS Wiki [1] if you don't have another suggestion and
notify here when done.
Thanks a lot Nicklas for raising this discussion!

I am sure GRASS will benefit if we allow new C standard features, e.g.
handling of integer types, math constants, nan, inf, etc, which will also
improve portability.

Markus M

> Best,
> Nicklas
> [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC
> On Thursday, 11 February 2021, 12:54:30 CET, Moritz Lennert <
mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> On 10/02/21 13:16, Nicklas Larsson wrote:
> > It would be most favourable for all contributors and the project if the
> > community could come to an agreement on this topic. I see no reason to
> > postpone a decision on this much longer.
> >
> > The final word on this need to be that of the PSC's. Whether through
> > simple vote or a RFC. However, a sounding of the opinion of the
> > dev-community on this matter is of equal importance and can be of help
> > for the PSC.
> Thanks a lot, Nicklas, for this very comprehensive summary !
> A suggestion made at the first meeting of the new PSC was to use this
> discussion as a use case for a more extensive usage of RFC's to put
> important decisions into more permanent documents than mailing list
> archives and to provoke a formal decision as you suggest. Would you be
> willing to write a first draft of such an RFC ?
> Moritz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20210212/b565b9d9/attachment.html>

More information about the grass-dev mailing list