[GRASS-PSC] RFC3: New voting rules

[Scott Mitchell]

Madi’s suggestion makes sense to me.  I suppose that the wording of #2 could be modified to allow for the case where all members have already voted with no dissenting comments, if we think a rush situation might come up.  I.e. instead of just increasing 4 days to 7 days, it could be worded as a default 7 days if comments are still being exchanged and votes coming in, but less time if everyone has voted without issue.

On Apr 6, 2014, at 07:48 , Margherita Di Leo <diregola at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:
> PSC;
> 
> since the voting discussion is scattered around in various email
> threads, I start a new one to separate it from ongoing motions. Please
> re-express your comments as answer to this email.
> 
>   RFC3: PSC Voting Procedures
>   http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html
> 
> I fully support this proposal. My only concern raises about "business day" definition. PSC members are from all over the world and it might happen to be public holidays in some countries and working days in some else. I'd propose to change this sentence:
> 
> "Proposals are available for review for at least four business days" 
> 
> into:
> 
> "Proposals are available for review for at least seven days"
> 
> Would this be OK?
> 
> Thanks,
> Madi
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dr. Margherita DI LEO    
> Scientific / technical project officer
> 
> European Commission - DG JRC 
> Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
> Via Fermi, 2749
> I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261
>        
> Tel. +39 0332 78 3600   
> margherita.di-leo at jrc.ec.europa.eu
> 
> Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20140406/d6384486/attachment.html>