[GRASS-PSC] RFC3: New voting rules

[Massimiliano Cannata]

In my opinion things worked quite fine in the last years.

- Madi proposal is also fine: 7 days may give more chance for everybody to
be connected for voting.
- Probably having majority only after that period would suffice for motion
to pass.
- Vote is mandatory for write access to SVN, otherwise take place only if
called (important issues only in my opinion or when discussion in mailing
list do not bring to a commonly accepted solution).

This is just my point of view. :-)

Maxi
Il 6-apr-2014 19:24 "Markus Neteler" <neteler at osgeo.org> ha scritto:

> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Moritz Lennert
> <mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> > On 06/04/14 12:48, Markus Neteler wrote:
> >>
> >> PSC;
> >>
> >> since the voting discussion is scattered around in various email
> >> threads, I start a new one to separate it from ongoing motions. Please
> >> re-express your comments as answer to this email.
> >>
> >>    RFC3: PSC Voting Procedures
> >>    http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html
> >>
> >
> > Thank you for this revised version !
>
> just FYI: it is not revised but as before (several years, I guess).
>
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20140406/d338786b/attachment.html>