Discussion on 4.2.1 update frequency
Skip Haak
shaak at teleport.com
Fri Jun 19 11:12:48 EDT 1998
Markus,
I wouldn't have a problem with the frequency of the updates if you provided
patches to existing versions. I don't like having to download the entire
program and reinstalling. If the updates are to fix problems, I think the
higher the frequency the better.
Skip
>Dear GRASS Community,
>
>you may have realized that the update frequency for
>GRASS 4.2.1 is very high. I would like to ask you
>(start a discussion on this point), what way do you
>prefer for future development:
>
> Sceneries (all ways certainly with publishing of small
> update packages beside the full code package):
>
> a) update with high frequency (all 2 weeks depending
> on input like today)
>
> b) update with medium frequency (monthly for example)
>
> c) update with less frequency (e.g. collecting changes for
> half a year)
>
>I expect that the base package of GRASS 5.0 will be
>published in late summer 1998. Because all functions could
>not yet be included in that distribution, GRASS 4.2.1 will
>survive for some time in parallel to allow a "soft migration".
>Later this year (or next year) the other functionality of
>4.2 will be migrated to 5.0.
>Therefore I need your opinion on future development of 4.2.1.
>
>Hope to hear from you soon (I suggest to discuss on this topic
>through the mailing list to make it most public),
>
> Markus Neteler
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Geographisches Institut | Institute of Geography
> Physische Geographie Physical Geography
> & Landschaftsoekologie & Landscape Ecology
>Universitaet Hannover University of Hannover, Germany
> neteler at geog.uni-hannover.de
> http://www.geog.uni-hannover.de/users/neteler/
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
-----------------------------------------------
Skip Haak
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.
Portland, Oregon, USA
More information about the grass-user
mailing list