Discussion on 4.2.1 update frequency

[J. HOLLENBECK]

Markus-

	I would have to agree completely with Skip Haak's remarks (below).
Perhaps publishing the entire new source code bi-monthly or quarterly with
fixes/patches updated much more often.  I would also like to see the GRASS
Module page present interesting modules every now and then ... Monthly?
Some of us get stuck using the same old routines and sometimes forget that
there are other possibly better or newer modules available.  My 2 cents.

--------------------------------------
Jeff P. Hollenbeck
Dept. of Fishery and Wildlife Sciences
New Mexico State University
jhollenb at nmsu.edu

On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Skip Haak wrote:

> Markus,
> 
> I wouldn't have a problem with the frequency of the updates if you provided
> patches to existing versions. I don't like having to download the entire
> program and reinstalling. If the updates are to fix problems, I think the
> higher the frequency the better.
> 
> Skip
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> Skip Haak
> Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.
> Portland, Oregon, USA
> 
>