[GRASSLIST:2073] Re: GRASS v ESRI
grass at cubok.com
Thu Jul 5 10:18:28 EDT 2001
So IMS is not a total partner to ArcInfo?
It seemed that way - I thought I must be reading or doing something
----- Original Message -----
From: "B. Byars" <Bruce_Byars at baylor.edu>
To: "Richard Ford" <grass at cubok.com>
Cc: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki at canaan.co.il>; "GrassList"
<GRASSLIST at baylor.edu>
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [GRASSLIST:2070] Re: GRASS v ESRI
> > They are nice - but ArcIMS - is so inflexible and only runs on NT -
> > a dog of a server OS.
> IMS also has a memory leak big enough to drive a truck through on NT.
> documented this, contacted ESRI, and they have NOT responded about it.
> are supposed to have it fixed for the the newest version. There are Linux
> versions that are more robust, but IMS is limited in what you can do. It
> doesn't even
> support raster data.
> IMS also has issues with the robustness of the platform it runs on. Start
> multiple users and you will have a crash. In addition to the memory leak,
> memory hog.
> I do like SDE although it's like learning a totally new language. If
> wants the
> pro-cons, I'll post them.
More information about the grass-user