[GRASSLIST:461] Re: m.in.e00 question

[Michel Wurtz]

Michael Ash wrote:

> However, Michel's post suggests that "-i" is the appropriate
> option because coverage-# can be shuffled by subsequent
> processing while coverage-ID is fixed.  I would be grateful
> for clarification.

I just wanted to say that if you have attributes in an *external*
database linked to the Arc/info Coverage, it probably uses the
coverage-ID as the link field, so it may be interesting to take
it for the aat number...

If you have only an e00 file, coverage-# is the choice.

-- 
Michel Wurtz - Auzeville-Tolosane