[GRASS-user] Streams under r.watershed
Hamish
hamish_b at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 13 19:26:14 EDT 2008
Kurt Springs wrote:
> I have generated some watershed maps some time ago. I intend to do it
> again from my PhD project. I was hoping someone could explain what
> the various maps generated mean. The Streams maps especially seem to
> be trying to tell me something as do the Basins. I tried generating a
> legend for streams but I don't know what the numbers mean and the
> colors seem to be repeating themselves.
We are lucky in that for once the help page is well developed.
from the man page:
basin
Output map: Unique label for each watershed basin.
Each basin will be given a unique positive even inte-
ger. Areas along edges may not be large enough to
create an exterior watershed basin. 0 values indicate
that the cell is not part of a complete watershed
basin in the current geographic region.
stream
Output map: stream segments. Values correspond to the
watershed basin values.
So stream segment cat numbers correspond to the basins that they bisect.
If a stream segment falls within watershed #36, its cat will be 36.
The dominant stream in the watershed will split the basin into two
half.basin*s, "The right-hand side cell of the watershed
basin (looking upstream) are given even values corre-
sponding to the values in basin. The left-hand side
cells of the watershed basin are given odd values
which are one less than the value of the watershed
basin."
[*] the option has been renamed to half_basin in GRASS 7
Basins and Streams maps produced by r.watershed use the same color table.
If there are less than 10000 watersheds it is unlikely that colors will
exactly repeat. If there are >10000, the colors are created by
G_make_random_colors() and at most 1024 colors are used(?).
If you have non connecting tributaries you wish to label, connect contiguous segments with r.cost or v.net.iso. (search the archives for
exact recipe)
You can create a custom color table with r.colors if you prefer.
Hamish
ps- Are you testing Markus Metz's new version of r.watershed? It is
supposed to be a zillion times faster.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel/29685/
More information about the grass-user
mailing list