[GRASS-user] problem with disk space. Raster data

[Hamish]

Antonio wrote:
> I'm performing a couple of treatments over a specific region
> and my problems arise when I deal with UTM projection in
> contrast with Lat/Lon projection.
> 
> 1) I import my raster data (Aster Dem) using the properties
> of the georreferenced GeoTiff image with wgs84 datum and lat/lon
> projection
> 2) I perform, for example, a r.shaded.relief over the data
> and everything runs fine. I get my new file in a decent time
> 
> The problem arise when after creating a newlocation with
> the corresponding lat/lon coordinates transformed to UTM ones I
> try to follow the steps above.
> 
> 1) The import of the new data is OK and I can see the image
> with no problem, but...
> 2) performing the r.shaded.relief process I got a full hard
> disk (100%) and an overnight run for the computer

what does 'g.region -p' say about the computational region?

in your utm location try 'g.region rast=YOUR_MAP_NAME_HERE'
before running raster modules to set the computational region
to match that map's bounds and resolution.


Hamish