[GRASS-user] help with testing the location wizard for the upcoming release

Jon Eiriksson jeir at hi.is
Wed Jun 5 09:51:57 PDT 2013


Should have mentioned the platform: Mac OSX 10.7.5

On 5 Jun 2013, at 17:54, Jon Eiriksson wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Using
> grass64_release
> revision revision 56596
>
> I did not come across any problems in creating Locations (from custom 
> prj parameters, from a georeferenced shape file, or directly from a 
> prj file).
>
>
>
> 1.
> Location created from georeferenced data file
> [shape file from ArcGIS]
>
> g.proj -p
> -PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
> name       : Lambert Conformal Conic
> proj       : lcc
> ellps      : grs80
> lat_1      : 64.25
> lat_2      : 65.75
> lat_0      : 65
> lon_0      : -19
> x_0        : 500000
> y_0        : 500000
> no_defs    : defined
> -PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
> unit       : Meter
> units      : Meters
> meters     : 1
> (Wed Jun  5 17:35:28 2013) Command finished (0 sec)
>
> 2. g.proj -p [on location created using custom PROJ.4 parameters:
> ---
> # ISN93 / Lambert 1993
> <3057> +proj=lcc +lat_1=64.25 +lat_2=65.75 +lat_0=65 +lon_0=-19 
> +x_0=500000 +y_0=500000 +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m 
> +no_defs  <>
> ---
> ]
>
> g.proj -p
> -PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
> name       : Lambert Conformal Conic
> proj       : lcc
> ellps      : grs80
> lat_1      : 64.25
> lat_2      : 65.75
> lat_0      : 65
> lon_0      : -19
> x_0        : 500000
> y_0        : 500000
> towgs84    : 0,0,0,0,0,0,0
> no_defs    : defined
> -PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
> unit       : Meter
> units      : Meters
> meters     : 1
> (Wed Jun  5 17:38:50 2013) Command finished (0 sec)
>
> 3. Location created reading projection and datum terms from a PRJ file
> [from a shape file folder from ArcGIS]
>
> g.proj -p
> -PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
> name       : Lambert Conformal Conic
> proj       : lcc
> ellps      : grs80
> lat_1      : 64.25
> lat_2      : 65.75
> lat_0      : 65
> lon_0      : -19
> x_0        : 500000
> y_0        : 500000
> no_defs    : defined
> -PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
> unit       : Meter
> units      : Meters
> meters     : 1
> (Wed Jun  5 17:42:37 2013) Command finished (0 sec)
>
> Jon
>
> On 26 May 2013, at 13:20, Hamish wrote:
>
>> Hi, this is a general call for help.
>>
>> if anyone/everyone is able to help test, we have made some fixes
>> to the wxGUI new location wizard since 6.4.3rc3, which really
>> need to be tested well before the final release. We think all is
>> ok now, but a messed up location projection definition and ruin
>> everything downstream in the location, so it's an important
>> thing to be totally sure of.
>>
>>
>> since there are so many projections and datums and ways to
>> select them, it's pretty hard to test for "working/not working"
>> as we usally could do. Please try throwing your local odd-ball
>> CRS at it and see what happens. (check all the way through to
>> 'g.proj -p' and 'g.proj -j' in the final location session. make
>> sure it does what you'd expect it to do.
>>
>> specifically how datum transforms are handled, and CRSs without
>> a specificed datum or specified datum terms; usuing all methods
>> of defining the projection system. see trac issues #1849 and
>> #1967 for further details.
>>
>>
>> known issues:
>> users of proj 4.7.0 and 4.8.0 will get different results for
>> the default datum transform terms. (PROJ.4 now decides differently,
>> beyond our control)
>> when reading from a .prj or WKT file, or creating from a geo-
>> referenced file, with unspecified datum transform opts, you will
>> not be prompted to enter them. the location will be created not
>> mentioning them, but in the background PROJ.4 will assign some
>> default value (of its choosing) silently.
>>
>>
>> for those who use Subversion and compile, you know what to do;
>> for those who don't, nightly test builds are available for Windows
>> and Ubuntu.
>>
>>
>> thanks a bunch,
>> Hamish
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-user mailing list
>> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user


More information about the grass-user mailing list