[GRASS-user] Keeping GRASS/OTB/... algorithm in qgis processing

[Margherita Di Leo]

Il giorno lun 5 feb 2018 alle 12:40 Helmut Kudrnovsky <hellik at web.de> ha
scritto:

> Dear GRASS GIS community,
>
> herewith I may bring a discussion on QGIS dev ML about how to proceed with
> maintaining GRASS, OTB and other algorithms in qgis processing to your
> attention.
>
>
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-Keeping-OTB-algorithm-in-qgis-processing-td5352056.html
>
> it seems that a shared attempt may be needed for a long-term, sustainable
> solution.
>
> citing here my post in that thread:
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2018-February/051892.html
>
> ---------------------------
> >Otherwise if we don't care and just want to enable others to have QGIS
> >intgration, they'll have to adopt the plugins.  That might work better if
> there
> >is real interest.  But I think they usally prefer their tools to be used
> in
> >their own environment and don't care that much about whether it works in
> QGIS
> <or not.  Is there solid interest of the SAGA or GRASS team to adopt the
> >providers?  Otherwise I guess they'll sooner or later will die.
>
> quickly screened the GRASS MLs, I can't find any entry that the GRASS
> community was ever asked if there could be e.g. a shared attempt for an
> automatization to create/maintain the plugin code.
>
> Looking at the new OSGeo website:
>
> *Desktop Applications*
>
> -QGIS Desktop
> -GRASS GIS
>
> *Geospatial Libraries*
>
> -Orfeo ToolBox
> -GDAL/OGR
>
> *Meta CRS Initiative*
>
> -PROJ4
>
> Most of the software mentioned in this thread are projects under the common
> umbrella of OSGeo.
>
> An option may be to ask that OSGeo plays a more proactive role in helping
> to
> coordinate and supporting (technically/financally/...) such inter-project
> challenges.
>
> I will forward a short summary of this thread to the GRASS community.
> --------------------------
>
> contributions of ideas/support/technical solutions/... are very welcome.
>

Thank you Helli. I wonder if this could be suitable for a GSoC project?

>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> best regards
> Helmut
> --
> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Users-f3884509.html
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

-- 
Margherita Di Leo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20180205/52e871ee/attachment.html>