[gvSIG_Italian] Peakflow output

Niccolo Tubini tubini.niccolo a gmail.com
Mar 28 Ago 2018 02:36:48 PDT


ok, e il timestep e` 1 minuto giusto?



Il giorno mar 28 ago 2018 alle ore 11:35 Silvia Franceschi <
silvia.franceschi a gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Ciao Niccolò,
> credo che la differenza sia dovuta a due modi diversi di calcolare la
> portata massima, ovvero nel log vedi il calcolo diretto nell'istante esatto
> del massimo, mentre nel CSV il calcolo è fatto rispettando gli intervalli
> di tempo indicati. E' anche normale che ci siano intervalli un po' diversi,
> in realtà sarebbero arrotondati... ma lo puoi fare a mano.
>
> Silvia
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:50 AM Niccolo Tubini <tubini.niccolo a gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ciao Silvia,
>>
>> la celerita` 4m/s l'ho messa per vedere cosa sarebbe cambiato a parita`
>> degli altri input rispetto all'idrogramma ottenuto con una celerita` di
>> 2m/s. Mi rendo conto che e` alta pero` essendo la prima volta che usavo
>> peakflow volevo capire come i vari input incidessero sul risultato della
>> simulazione.
>> Il bacino su cui sto lavorando e` il Rio secco (area ~1.4 Km2 e lunghezza
>> dell'asta principale ~2km).
>>
>> Ho rilanciato la simulazione e ottengo gli stessi valori. Abbasando il
>> valore della celerita` a 3m/s nel log leggo 38.79 m3/s e nel csv 35.05, con
>> 2m/s nel log 26.72 m3/s e nel csv 26.95 m3/s.
>>
>> Un'altra cosa (spero l'ultima) il timestep dell'idrogramma non e` costante
>> 2018-08-28 06:44,0.0
>> ,2018-08-28 06:46,3.3871822587362477
>> ,2018-08-28 06:48,11.024139734276767
>> ,2018-08-28 06:49,17.5583421869693
>> ,2018-08-28 06:51,23.00152613016996
>> ,2018-08-28 06:53,26.954433356925595
>> ,2018-08-28 06:54,23.025622427416245
>> a volte e` 1 minuto altre volte 2, e` normale?
>>
>> Grazie ancora della disponibilita`, ciao
>> Niccolo`
>>
>> Il giorno lun 27 ago 2018 alle ore 20:50 Silvia Franceschi <
>> silvia.franceschi a gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Ciao Niccolò,
>>> la durata della precipitazione è in minuti, riguardo invece la portata
>>> massima, di solito differenzia di un pochino tra log e file però in questo
>>> caso mi pare esagerata la differenza. Sei sicuro di star guardando il CSV
>>> corretto? inoltre la velocità di 4 m/s che hai impostato mi sembra un
>>> pochino alta, che bacino hai?
>>>
>>> Silvia
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:45 PM Niccolo Tubini <tubini.niccolo a gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ciao a tutti,
>>>>
>>>> ho lanciato il comando Peakflow e nella finestra Spatial Toolbox log
>>>> leggo questo
>>>> Process started: 2018-08-24 12:35:43
>>>> ------------------------------>8----------------------------
>>>> Launching command:
>>>> ------------------
>>>> C:\Program
>>>> Files\gvSIG-desktop\gvSIG-desktop-2.4.0\gvSIG\extensiones\jre\bin\java.exe
>>>> -Xmx2000m -cp
>>>> "C:\Users\Niccolo\gvSIG\installation\gvSIG\extensiones\org.hortonmachine.gvsig.base\lib\groovy-all-2.4.6.jar;C:\Users\Niccolo\gvSIG\installation\gvSIG\extensiones\org.hortonmachine.gvsig.base\lib/*;."
>>>> groovy.ui.GroovyMain
>>>> C:\Users\Niccolo\AppData\Local\Temp\hm_script_330421177113872359.groovy
>>>> (you can run the above from command line, customizing the content)
>>>> ----------------------------------->8---------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Script run:
>>>> -----------
>>>> org.hortonmachine.modules.Peakflow _peakflow = new
>>>> org.hortonmachine.modules.Peakflow();
>>>> _peakflow.pA = 49.5;
>>>> _peakflow.pSat = 80;
>>>> _peakflow.pCelerity = 4;
>>>> _peakflow.outDischarge = """C:/Users/Niccolo/Documents/provaQ.csv""";
>>>> _peakflow.inTopindex =
>>>> """C:/Users/Niccolo/gvSIG-workspace/RioSecco_5m_25832/top_index_corrected_cut.asc""";
>>>> _peakflow.inRescaledsub =
>>>> """C:/Users/Niccolo/gvSIG-workspace/RioSecco_5m_25832/resc_dist_r100_80_sub_cut.asc""";
>>>> _peakflow.inRescaledsup =
>>>> """C:/Users/Niccolo/gvSIG-workspace/RioSecco_5m_25832/resc_dist_r5_80_sup_cut.asc""";
>>>> _peakflow.pN = 0.32;
>>>> _peakflow.pDiffusion = 1000;
>>>> _peakflow.process();
>>>> println ""
>>>> println ""
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------>8----------------------------
>>>> Reading coverage: top_index_corrected_cut.asc
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Reading coverage: resc_dist_r5_80_sup_cut.asc
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Reading coverage: resc_dist_r100_80_sub_cut.asc
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Vectorizing double vectors
>>>> Sorting...
>>>> ...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Splitting real vectors
>>>> 1 empty bins where found
>>>> Creating new matrix
>>>> Vectorizing double vectors
>>>> Sorting...
>>>> ...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Splitting real vectors
>>>> Creating new matrix
>>>> Vectorizing double vectors
>>>> Sorting...
>>>> ...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Splitting real vectors
>>>> 12 empty bins where found
>>>> Creating new matrix
>>>> Peakflow launched in statistic mode...
>>>> IUH Diffusion...
>>>> Calculating diffusion...
>>>> 0%...
>>>> 10%...
>>>> 20%...
>>>> 30%...
>>>> 40%...
>>>> 50%...
>>>> 60%...
>>>> 70%...
>>>> 80%...
>>>> 90%...
>>>> 100%...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Calculating subsurface IUH...
>>>> 10%...
>>>> 20%...
>>>> 30%...
>>>> 40%...
>>>> 50%...
>>>> 60%...
>>>> 70%...
>>>> 80%...
>>>> 90%...
>>>> 100%...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> IUH Diffusion...
>>>> 0%...
>>>> 10%...
>>>> 20%...
>>>> 30%...
>>>> 40%...
>>>> 50%...
>>>> 60%...
>>>> 70%...
>>>> 80%...
>>>> 90%...
>>>> 100%...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Statistic Jeff...
>>>> Q calculation...
>>>> Calculating Jeff...
>>>> Calculating discharge for t < tcorr...
>>>> 0%...
>>>> 10%...
>>>> 20%...
>>>> 30%...
>>>> 40%...
>>>> 50%...
>>>> 60%...
>>>> 70%...
>>>> 80%...
>>>> 90%...
>>>> 100%...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Calculating discharge for t > tcorr...
>>>> 0%...
>>>> 10%...
>>>> 20%...
>>>> 30%...
>>>> 40%...
>>>> 50%...
>>>> 60%...
>>>> 70%...
>>>> 80%...
>>>> 90%...
>>>> 100%...
>>>> Finished.
>>>> Maximum rainfall duration: 115.0
>>>> Maximum discharge value: 50.25414096383695
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Process finished: 2018-08-24 12:35:52
>>>>
>>>> Quando pero` apro il file .csv di output la portata massima e` pari a
>>>> 37.76900478990363, la portata massima corretta e` quella nel .csv?
>>>> Riporto le prime righe del .csv
>>>> @H,date,discharge
>>>> Format,yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm,
>>>> Type,Date,
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:35,0.0
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:37,37.76900478990363
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:39,35.33001832680685
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:40,20.212508980665184
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:42,13.446104538944528
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:44,9.892880269987524
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:45,7.5939577680423245
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:47,6.011784274922036
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:49,4.929564446763167
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:50,4.122217965006686
>>>> ,2018-08-24 10:52,3.531891748182115
>>>>
>>>> Inoltre volevo chiedere se la durata della precipitazione riportata nel
>>>> log e` espressa in minuti.
>>>>
>>>> Grazie in anticipo,
>>>> Niccolo`
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gvSIG-Italian mailing list
>>>> gvSIG-Italian a lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gvsig-italian
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ing. Silvia Franceschi
>>> Via Latemar, 22
>>> 38030 Castello di Fiemme (TN)
>>>
>>> tel: 0039 -3384501332
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gvSIG-Italian mailing list
>>> gvSIG-Italian a lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gvsig-italian
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gvSIG-Italian mailing list
>> gvSIG-Italian a lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gvsig-italian
>>
>
>
> --
> ing. Silvia Franceschi
> Via Latemar, 22
> 38030 Castello di Fiemme (TN)
>
> tel: 0039 -3384501332
> _______________________________________________
> gvSIG-Italian mailing list
> gvSIG-Italian a lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gvsig-italian
>
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gvsig-italian/attachments/20180828/812c8b75/attachment.html>


Maggiori informazioni sulla lista gvSIG-Italian