[Incubator] [rasdaman-users] Re: Rasdaman as a 'Benevolent dictatorship' Project: was [rasdaman-dev] patch quality

[Beccati, Alan]

Indeed a good topic for consideration too. I guess from recent mails OSGeo is somewhat aware of this and I hope this will be sorted out soon on their side. Especially this apparent "blocker" issue.

Alan


-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitar Misev [mailto:misev.rasdaman at googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dimitar Misev
Sent: 02 August 2013 13:43
To: rasdaman-dev at googlegroups.com
Cc: Beccati, Alan; rasdaman-users at googlegroups.com; Susanne Ebrecht; Baumann, Peter; Bruce Bannerman; incubator at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [rasdaman-users] Re: [Incubator] Rasdaman as a 'Benevolent dictatorship' Project: was [rasdaman-dev] patch quality

My point was that there are many very successful open-source projects running in this way. So it's unclear (at least to me) why would OSGeo impose such an artificial restriction on how OSGeo graduated projects should be managed and consider this a "blocker" for any project wanting to join.

On 08/02/2013 01:12 PM, Beccati, Alan wrote:
> Since the topic is OSGeo incubaton I would not give too much to the almighty kernel and his leader, they do not want graduation and are free to follow whatever model they prefer which is also the case for JTS (as cited by Jody[1]).