[Incubator] [Board] osgeo labs - Maturity Rating

[Jachym Cepicky]

Cameron, I do not like your (or marketing's) proposal - it seems to
me, it's too towards-incubation oriented. But it has some important
details. I also think, 4 and 5 should be merged.

I propose following version:

1 - Project has name, OSI license, header files are clean, can be in beta stage
2 - Project is stable, produces (or produced in the past) stable releases
3 - Project has Stable Software, a Stable community, is deployed in
production systems, and is ready to pass criteria to enter incubation,
as per:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/evaluation.html
4 -  Project has passed osgeo incubation, it also includes bundled
software, regular builds, security updates, training, etc.

comments?

Jachym

2014-09-20 1:24 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>:
> We discussed a 5 star maturity rating in 2010. I still like the idea, but it
> was contentious at the time, especially with projects which would rank low
> on the rating, and it was eventually dropped in favour of using just
> "Incubated"/"Incubating" as more politically acceptable.
>
> This is what we proposed:
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Artefacts&oldid=51118#Maturity_Rating
>
> Maturity Rating
>
> Description A 5 star rating system to qualify the how established a project
> is. Rating is to be broken down as follows:
>
> 5 stars: This rating is yet to be defined, and will not be allocated to
> projects yet. Project includes bundled software, regular builds, security
> updates, training, etc.
> 4 stars (mature): Project has passed osgeo incubation as per:
> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html
> 3.5 stars: Not to be used yet, but may later be introduced for projects
> which have entered incubation.
> 3 stars (established): Project has Stable Software, a Stable community, is
> deployed in production systems, and is ready to pass criteria to enter
> incubation, as per:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/evaluation.html
> 2 stars (stable): Project has Stable Software.
>
> Project produces periodic releases of stable software which is used in
> production systems.
>
> 1 star (beta): Project has Beta software.
>
>
> Discussion about it here:
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2010-June/thread.html
>
> On 19/09/2014 8:41 am, Luca Delucchi wrote:
>
> On 18 September 2014 23:10, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Or
>
> level 1 - project (name, license, headers)
> level 2 - code clean checked
> level 3 - steering committee
> level 4 - ...
> level 5 - community, mature osgeo project
>
> drift between levels is possible both ways (you lost community e.g.)
>
> I really like this idea...
>
> jody could give more insight view
>
> Jachym
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board



-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp

Give your code freedom with PyWPS - http://pywps.wald.intevation.org