[Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 15:25:34 PDT 2016
Hi all,
I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape.
I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode
on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.
However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure
So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release
Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).
While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions
for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest
running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to
the OSGeo code of conduct.
On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> You are correct David, twice:
> - incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the
> issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known
> problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or
> steer clear as appropriate).
> - none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check
> went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming
> with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)
>
> That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I
> am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation
> (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to
> the code changing ownership).
>
> It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond
> with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)
>
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <bitner at dbspatial.com
> <mailto:bitner at dbspatial.com>> wrote:
>
> Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
> went out.
>
> The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
> brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
> any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
> bring them up here.
>
> Here is the current status on votes:
>
> * Bruce Bannerman
> * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
> * Landon Blake +1
> * Howard Butler
> * Arnulf Christl +1
> * Jody Garnett (chair)
> * Dimitris Kotzinos
> * Tom Kralidis +1
> * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
> * Mark Lucas
> * Steve Lime +1
> * Daniel Morissette
> * Markus Schneider
> * Cameron Shorter
> * Jeroen Ticheler
> * Norman Vine
> * Frank Warmerdam
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
> <jlacroix at mapgears.com <mailto:jlacroix at mapgears.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Julien
>
> On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:
>
> Dear Incubation Committee,
>
> As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
> a motion to
> graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
> Jeff Johnson to
> act as the Project Officer.
>
> You will find the Incubation Checklist at:
>
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
> <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>
>
> During the incubation process much work has been done to
> solidify the
> intellectual property behind GeoNode.
>
> * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
> * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
> process
> created to collect from all contributors
> * all files have been checked for headers
> * the release process documentation has been shored up
>
> GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
> developers
> distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
> users have
> developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
> companies that
> have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
> There is no single
> point of failure for this project.
>
> The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
> in a way that
> has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
> institutions
> using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
> for GeoNode.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> --
> ************************************
> David William Bitner
> dbSpatial LLC
> 612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>
>
> --
> Julien-Samuel Lacroix
> T: +1 418-696-5056 #202 <tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
> Mapgears
> http://www.mapgears.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ************************************
> David William Bitner
> dbSpatial LLC
> 612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20160904/c85f7796/attachment.html>
More information about the Incubator
mailing list