[Liblas-devel] Re: las2txt question
Etienne Bellemare
etiennebr at gmail.com
Thu Oct 28 16:44:53 EDT 2010
Good point, I'd like to suggest also the ability to specify the header
separated the same way the fields are going to be. It will create a much
more consistent file. e.g. for the moment you can't use tab to seperate
header even if your fields are. Having the ability to set a name for the
header could be a nice feature too.
Thanks again,
Etienne
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Howard Butler <hobu.inc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Randy Bucciarelli wrote:
>
> > Hi Howard,
> >
> > Is there a way to format resulting precision of values from the output of
> las2txt?
> >
> > Or does 'las2txt' simply output the precision of the values how there
> were initially stored when creating LAS files?
>
> There isn't, but I agree there should be an option to set/override the
> precision of x/y/z values (independently) I have rewritten lasinfo and
> las2las using the new C++ API, and I think las2txt should also be rewritten
> as well. In summary output and other venues in those rewritten utilities, I
> have tried to respect the specified scale/precision of the dimension if it
> was set in the header.
>
> Rewriting las2txt similarly to lasinfo and las2las is in my queue, but I
> probably won't get to it for a bit.
>
> Howard
>
> PS, this question should be asked on the list, and I have forwarded it
> there._______________________________________________
> Liblas-devel mailing list
> Liblas-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/liblas-devel/attachments/20101028/1e66bed7/attachment.html
More information about the Liblas-devel
mailing list