[Live-demo] App Dependencies [was Nightly doc builds back online; further action on doc licenses needed]

Alex Mandel tech_dev at wildintellect.com
Thu Jul 28 13:35:36 EDT 2011


Bob,

That's why we have the feature freeze deadline, It's the date and which
application versions are supposed to be set so we have time to deal with
things that may relate. We could add a field to the ongoing spreadsheet
where we track what versions are on the disc(yes ideally in the future
this would be some type of CMS website). This is yet another reason why
we are encouraging everyone to creating deb packages for their project
too - automatic dependency handling.

Thanks,
Alex

On 07/28/2011 07:25 AM, Bob Basques wrote:
> 
> Steve, 
> 
> Not that I know of.  It's not a big problem from here, just need to
> figure out how to version things so everyone know what's on the DVD (and
> that it may be different for a while from GeoMoose website. maybe better
> to just not say anything right away, and remember the MapFile
> difference. 
> 
> I did mention the dependency matrix a few weeks back, doesn't seem like
> there's been much time to put that kind of thing together this close to
> letting the DVD out though. 
> 
> I also mentioned using some sort of WEB FORM for registering an
> application for the DVD, This would be a good spot to add dependency
> info, and then the Matrix could be a generated report instead. 
> 
> bobb 
> 
> 
> 
>>>> "Lime, Steve D (DNR)" <steve.lime at state.mn.us> wrote:
> 
> 
> Sorry Bob, an unintended consequence… Is there a dependency matrix
> available? 
> Steve 
> 
> From: live-demo-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:live-demo-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bob Basques
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:05 AM
> To: Cameron Shorter; live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [Live-demo] Nightly doc builds back online; further action
> on doc licenses needed 
> 
>   
> All,  
>    
> I was just informed about the reason for the GeoMoose running Error on
> the LiveDVD.    
>    
> Seems the MapServer version was changed which requires some
> modifications to MapFiles.  Probably breaks for others I would imagine
> that are using the LiveDVD Mapserver..  
>    
> For future consideration, I submit the idea that any potentially shared
> resources either be locked in earlier than the dependent packages during
> the DVD assembly period, or that at the very least, the version from the
> previous DVD is kept in the install mix (if possible).  
>    
> bobb  
>    
> 
> 
>>>> Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> On 25/07/11 21:08, Hamish wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the nightly doc build cron job is now an hourly cron job, and back up
> and
>> running.
>>
>> there's a bug: the licenses.csv file is sourced before it is
> generated.
>> it fails the first time,&  will grab an out of date version from then
> on.
>>
>>
>> by the way, instead of publicly pledging anything, it would be
> *much*
>> better if folks who are listed as authors just edited their
> quickstarts
>> etc and expanded the license line in their .rst files as they see
> fit.
> While I'm no fan of all the effort spent addressing licensing
> discussions and requirements, we have followed the protocols of other
> OSGeo projects going through incubation, which usually use a public
> statement to an email list as a requirement to getting svn access.
> 
> 
>>   No
>> one else may change the copyright license line on their behalf!, so
>> everyone must do that anyway, and should do that now.
> I think that it is not as black and white as you may suggest. In many
> cases there have been multiple authors for a document, and this is a
> little messy to capture in svn logs, (although I know it is possible).
> I would be more than happy for anyone to update the license statement
> in
> the subversion.
> However, I would also suggest that it should be ok for someone to
> change
> the license for a doc if they reference a public email saying that the
> author is ok with the license.
>>
>> (also I would suggest IMHO a separate license.html page is a waste
> of
>> time, the doc license just needs to be at the bottom of each page and
> no
>> more;
> 
>>   and I continue to be annoyed by seeing (c) Lisasoft at the bottom
> of
>> pages whos contents are entirely authored by myself and solely (c)
> OSGeo.
> Footer has been updated to be a "copyright" hyperlink which links to a
> copyright page. The copyright page contains a table which lists all
> documentation, the author(s) and licence(s), as extracted from the
> metadata in the docs by bin/extract_licenses.sh
> 
> http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/docs/en/copyright.html
> 
> Simon Cropper is reviewing for me at the moment, happy to hear
> comments
> from others too.
> 
>> IMHO the best solution is if lisasoft did like everyone else and
> just
>> donated their copyright t
> o osgeo.)
>>
>>
>> hourly build docs are here:
>>     http://adhoc.osgeo.osuosl.org/livedvd/
>>
>>
>> please work on the many issues found in the error log therein.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Hamish
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Live-demo mailing list
>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
> 
> 
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Director
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
> 
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc



More information about the Live-demo mailing list