[mapguide-users] RE: Guestion about speedup mapguide, diferent domainname to mapagent.fcgi.

[Kencana]

Hi,

I have done some load balancer for the map (from 4 servers), and the
performance still not acceptable.
took more than 25 secs to load the initial map.

I guess load balancer didn't affect the performance, maybe it will help in
increasing the number of map access
but not the performance.

Thanks

Kencana


JasonBirch wrote:
> 
> Paul wrote:
>  
>> m1.google.com
>> m2.google.com
>> m3.google.com
>> and that each of these resolves to the same IP. 
>  
> And that IP address is probably a load balancer...  I'm pretty sure that
> this single IP thing is not part of the performance measures.
>  
> Traian wrote:
>  
>> But then I decided that this can be worked around
>> by using a file system mount from the web server
>> to the server where the tiles are. I've seen a similar
>> thing done on Linux/Apache, not sure if Windows
>> could handle such a setup.
>  
> I've done this with IIS (CIFS share) and, while I can confirm that it
> works, it's a pain to set up and the performance is very poor compared to
> local filesystem access.
>  
> While this might be a good solution for some situations (like, where the
> tile servers are behind a firewall?), I think that it would be best to
> also have the option of being able to set up a local webserver on the tile
> servers to serve the tiles directly to the clients rather than having to
> do everything through the web tier server.
>  
> Jason
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Guestion-about-speedup-mapguide%2C-diferent-domainname-to-mapagent.fcgi.-tf3307731s16610.html#a9242696
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.