[mapguide-users] Move Default Repository Location?
jefferyjjensen at gmail.com
Thu Oct 2 15:29:02 EDT 2008
Hello Andrew and Jason,
Again thanks for sharing your experience on this.
I like the idea of using unmanaged data sets but I'm not sure if this will
slow down MapGuide. According to the web log at
http://zacster.blogspot.com/2008/10/mapguide-performance-tips.html #3 Always
use Managed Resources, that is SDF's uploaded into the repository.
If you haven't seen any changes in MapGuide performance between unmanaged
and manage SDF/SHP files, then yes, I would like to run with your advice and
use unmanaged data sets.
> My personal recommendation is to back up the entire repository. The
> recovery time of putting the managed data back in the correct locations
> by ResourceID is not going to be trivial.
> If you're looking to reduce backup size, you may want to look into using
> unmanaged data sets where possible. This allows you to point to the
> data outside of the MapGuide repository. Basically, you just set up an
> alias in your serverconfig.ini file (or through the MapGuide admin) and
> refer to data sets from that location when setting up new data sources.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JeffJensen
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] Move Default Repository Location?
> What is your opinion of not backing up the datafiles (C:/Program
> I ask, is this directory is rather large and the data I use is just a
> from the data created in other applications (namely Civil3D and ArcMap).
> thinking as long as I put the shapefiles back in the correct directory,
> won't have any issues with broken links.
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Move-Default-Repository-Location--tp8714272p19786033.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the mapguide-users