[mapguide-users] about the databases

[T.kiran kumar reddy]

Compare to the shp files oracle is working  faster, presently we are
converting shp to oracle spatial table through the mapbuilder, performence
is fine in our projects we are working upto the four lakhs records ,i know
upto this level performence is good. 

Srinivas Raparthi wrote:
> 
> Dear Kiran,
> 
> Well presently we are working on flat files SHP/SDF for entire North
> America data and planning to advance flat files to oracle spatial 10g for
> better performance. 
> 
> Can you let us know the performance using oracle 10g and the data you are
> working on..
> 
> Thanks
> Srinivas Raparthi.
> 
> 
> T.kiran kumar reddy wrote:
>> 
>> hi to every one,
>>        Presently i am using the mgos2.0,maestro r3911 , asp.net2.0,
>> orcale 10g with spatial support, i want to change to either mysql or
>> microsoft sequel server or post gre sql server which one is better to
>> support spatial data or with performence in all other issues , is
>> spatilal data is supported by all these databases? if any body uses these
>> databases please tell abuot these data bases performences
>>            
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/about-the-databases-tp3610107p3667737.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.