[Mapserver-dev] WMS and LAYERS= vs. STATUS Behaviour
Bart van den Eijnden
bartvde at xs4all.nl
Thu Apr 29 09:20:30 EDT 2004
Hi Daniel,
good idea I think.
I have created an enhancement bug about this:
http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=638
Best regards,
Bart
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:08:29 -0400, Daniel Morissette
<dmorissette at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:
> Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
>> I think users of Mapserver should be discouraged to use STATUS DEFAULT
>> in combination with the WMS interface. The best way to discourage them
>> is to provide a warning in the capabilities XML in my opinion.
>>
>
> Well, do we want to discourage them that badly? There may be legitimate
> uses of status default as mentioned in a previous email (for a copyright
> notice or a watermark for instance), and in this case the warning could
> become a real pain.
>
> There have been discussions before about adding something to prevent
> some layers from being listed/served via WMS. Perhaps we could use this
> in combination with your warning idea??? (i.e. we produce the warning
> for status default, and if someone really knows what they're doing then
> they can hide their layers that have status default to avoid the
> warning.)
>
--
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list