[Mapserver-dev] Re: mappool.c thoughts

[Sean Gillies]

On Oct 5, 2004, at 9:57 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:

> Sean Gillies wrote:
>  > I think it's a good thing that our functions require just the bare 
> minimum
>> context.  Passing a connection pool everywhere would suck.  I'm happy 
>> with
>> your proposed solution, with one additional suggestion.
>> Let's consider adding a
>>   ConnectionPool *connectionpool
>> member to layerObj.  If NULL, we use the default module-level pool.  
>> In the
>> mapscript case, it would reference an application-level pool.  Calls 
>> to
>> the msConnPool functions could be passed self->connectionpool.
>
> Sean,
>
> Sure, that sounds fine.  I try to work on this in the next couple 
> weeks.
>

Great.  I'll work on the mapscript interface.

Sean

--
Sean Gillies
sgillies at frii dot com
http://users.frii.com/sgillies